Okay, this really is not meant to put a damper on the big decision today from the California Supreme Court in The Marriage Cases.
Really, its not.
It was a heavy-duty (albeit 4-3) decision against California’s Prop 22. And, considering the rumors that had been flying about ominous behind-the-scenes activity, its a bit surprising. (A more positive, post-decision PHB thread can be found here.)
Now, however, its time for Kat the transsexual lawyer to lose a few more friends and piss off a few more GLB lawyers: Its a damn good thing that California already has a statute recognizing the reality of transsexualism (known colloquially as a transsexual birth certificate statute.)
Why?
Because of all of the uninformed voices I’ve heard over the years spot the following: Once we get same-sex marriage, all that stuff about what sex you are on your drivers license won’t matter.
Uh huh.
Right.
I’m requesting all those who believe that who are non-transsexual females to engage in a lil’ ol’ test to prove how much they really believe it.
Here’s how it goes:
- Get yourself a driver’s license that has an ‘M’ in place of your ‘F’.
- Drive around in Massachusetts (and, now, California.)
- Get yourself pulled over.
- Then judge for yourself how not-so-insignificant that gender marker is.
Oh…
Too ‘real’ for ya? Try this one:
- Get yourself a driver’s license that has an ‘M’ in place of your ‘F’.
- Go to Massachusetts (or even California, which, unlike Massachusetts, does include Ts in its anti-discrimination laws).
- Try to find a job.
- Then judge for yourself how not-so-insignificant that gender marker is.
Still too ‘real’ for ya? Try this one:
- Get yourself a driver’s license that has an ‘M’ in place of your ‘F’.
- Go to Massachusetts.
- Assume that you have a job waiting for you there.
- Begin work at that job.
- Use the ladies’ room.
- Continue to use the ladies’ room.
- Then judge for yourself how not-so-insignificant that gender marker is.
Again, I’m really not trying to put a damper on what is truly a very significant day in legal history.
However, I will always caution people to understand that same-sex marriage solves nothing for transsexuals as individual human beings.
May 19, 2008 at 12:50 pm
Amen, Kat. And I think Khadijah Farmer would agree with your assessment, since she just got a taste a few months ago of the ignorance we have to contend with.
May 23, 2008 at 11:22 am
Canada also works for your examples (same-sex marriage legal, transgender protections here and there).
I haven’t tried getting a job for those reasons, and other reasons like not having any specialization. Why would they pick me over anyone else, especially if they know about me right off from my legal information?