Is it Really Any More Ridiculous Than a Certain ‘Transsexual = Rapist, Wink, Wink, Nudge, Nudge’ Angle?

August 29, 2011

From Pam’s House Blah:

In fairness to the Blah, it actually is pretty sad:

While the gay community have been busy with other matters [Kat's query: Has NGLTF been busy responding to the Brennan-Hungerford exterminationism manifesto?], members of the religious right are perpetrating a slow but consistent march to a claim that acceptance of homosexuality will soon lead to the acceptance of pedophilia.

The key here is that these folks are not saying that pedophilia and homosexuality are connected, but rather are using a faulty “slippery slope” argument, i.e. – “just like the gay community is receiving more acceptance, pretty soon the pedophiles will be getting more acceptance.”

It began when the Liberty Counsel’s Matt Barber and a researcher by the name of Judith Reisman attended a recent symposium of a group – B4U-Act – who is seeking to  reduce “stigmatization and stereotyping of people who are attracted to children.”

Barber is no stranger to the gay community for his offensive anti-gay comments, but Reisman is not that widely known.

All you need to know about her is that she is a former songwriter for the show “Captain Kangaroo” who suddenly became a researcher (she does have a doctorate, but it’s in communications). According to writer Terry Krepel, she was given a federal grant of more than $784,000 to study 30 years worth of Playboy magazines. Her findings were dismissed as “paranoid pseudoscientific hyperbole.”

Let’s see…

These definitions would allow all males – including registered sex offenders or males subject to a domestic violence order of protection – to assert “gender identity” as a means to invade female-only space.

Let’s also see…

Behavior that would normally be considered criminal will now be protected as a civil right.

I’m just remindin’….

And I’m gonna keep remindin’….


The Intellectual Vomit of America’s Obscenely Rich

August 29, 2011

Stuart Varney:

The image we have of poor people as starving, living in squalor really is not accurate. Many of them have things, what they lack is the richness of spirit. That’s my opinion.

My opinion?

I think the Bolsheviks may have been right.


For Who?

August 28, 2011

Seen recently in the comments section to the Queer Channel Media piece about Pee Wee Solmonese getting ready to open his golden parachute:

I think that all in all the Joe Solmonese era at HRC will be seen as a positive one.

Its pretty sad when comments by laurelboy2 aren’t the most ridiculous ones on a web page.


The Phantom Penance

August 28, 2011

We are approaching the tenth anniversary of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s decision in Goins v. West Group (one of the trans judicial cases that neither Cathy Brennan nor Elizabeth Hungerford nor any of their apologists will tell those who would be affected by the Brennan-Hungerford exterminationism manifesto should it be implemented with force of law how they feel should have been decided.)

In the immediate aftermath of the ahistorical nonsense that the court foisted on the state in its decision, there was a community debriefing/decompression session held in Minneapolis on a cold December evening.

Not all that many people could be bothered to show up for it.

I recall a visibly dismayed Juli Goins opining, when she spoke at the gathering, that apparently people felt as though staying home to watch The West Wing was more important than discussing what the Minnesota Supreme Court had done to her, to all trans people in the state and to the Minnesota Human Rights Act itself.

Several people addressed the attendees from the ersatz stage.  Some of the attendees spoke from their positions in the audience.

One of those who spoke from the audience was affiliated with the National Gay-Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF.)

That person said that one way to prevent such travesties as the Goins decision in the future was more education about trans issues.

After the gathering was officially over, I went up to speak to the person.  I said that the suggestion was nice (because, contextually at least, it really was not quivalent to the perpetual HRC-St. Barney ENDA lie of ‘more education is necessary’) – and then kindly and tastefully suggested that perhaps one way for that professed goal to be attained was for NGLTF to hire some trans people to do the educating.

Anyone who has ever made any attempt whatsoever to discuss the obscene underrepresentation of trans people (particularly trans women) among the ranks of those who are permitted to earn a living with gay rights organizations, you know what came next: the person looked at me as if I had just clubbed a bunch of baby seals, puppies and kittens to death in the person’s presence.

It would be charitable to describe the person’s words thereafter as ‘defensive.’

It would be accurate to summarize those words as ‘How dare you question us??!??!’

And, no, the person affiliated with NGLTF to whom I refer above was not Sue Hyde

It also was not Matt Foreman.  Keep geography and the timeline in mind: This was late 2001 in Minnesota.  It would still be a year before New York’s Empire State Pride Agenda (ESPA), under Foreman’s stewardship, signed off on legislation giving that state’s gays and lesbians the right to discriminate against trans people

We would love to have transgender inclusion, but not at the expense of SONDA.

Then, four months later, Foreman moved on to NGLTF whilst crowing:

that NGLTF employs an attorney full time to advise local efforts aimed at protecting transgender rights.

A non-trans attorney…

in 2001, 2003 and now.

Yes, Matt Foreman received a de facto promotion from head of a state group that was – and still is – willing to bulldoze trans needs to get gays’ wants to a national organization that had a reputation for being trans-inclusive (despite, curiously, not having any trans people gainfully employed to do the inclusiv-ing.)  The result of this, of course, was not to convert Foreman in any substantive sense (even though he has professed regret about what happened in New York in 2002), but instead to neuter what was left of NGLTF’s credibility on the trans-inclusion argument. 

Recall one of the few instances of Chris Crain saying something that was remotely reality-based?

Foreman and his allies regularly engaged it such ridiculousness regularly during the ENDA debate, accusing anyone who agreed with Barney on tactics of being a transphobe. Ironic given that Foreman himself used Barney’s tactics to get New York’s state gay rights law passed.

Yes, Foreman signs off on civil rights apartheid for trans people in 2002 and he gets a promotion and, presumably, a raise.  (It is reasonable to assume that while with NGLTF he pulled down somewhere between the the $80K that The Quisling is paid to subvert trans rights from inside the trans movement and the $330K that Joe Solmonese was paid to subvert them from all other vantage points; it is also reasonable to assume that in his current position as a program director at the Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund he is in no danger needing the aid of a homeless shelter.)  And then when the ENDA hit the fan in 2007, a notorious gay male transphobe like Crain is able to accurately call out the head of the national gay rights group that claims to be trans-friendly as being a hypocrite for opposing the lie of ‘incremental progress.’

Sue Hyde signs off on a call for discrimination against transsexuals in 1977 and…

well, you know…

In 1974, Hyde cofounded Red Tomato, a production company that for eight years produced cultural events for women and lesbians in St. Louis, Missouri. Hyde relocated to Boston, Massachusetts in 1983 and became the editor of the Gay Community News, a position which she held for the next two years. In 1985, Hyde and others founded the Gay and Lesbian Defense Committee in response to Governor Michael Dukakis’ policy on foster care placements that banned same-sex couples from consideration. Hyde was hired by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force in 1986, and has worked for the organization since that time.

and you really know…

For two decades, Sue Hyde has inspired and nurtured organizers and led community members to participate in democracy with the goal of securing freedom, justice and equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people and their families.

She is a seasoned community organizer and advocate whose issue portfolio at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force has included repeal of sodomy laws, rescission of the military’s ban on openly gay, lesbian and bisexual servicemembers, passage of local and state civil rights laws, training leaders to effectively oppose right-wing incursions in their communities, directing the annual Creating Change Conference, and securing marriage equality for same-sex couples.

Hyde is an accomplished public speaker, teacher and writer whose wit, wisdom and wry observations of politics in these United States frame a tireless dedication to community building and an inexhaustible faith in our movement and its people. She was the recipient of the 2002 Stonewall Award in recognition of lifetime service to the LGBT political movement.

She also serves as the Task Force New England field organizer and lives in Cambridge, Mass., with her partner and their two children

Yes, an oral history interview and an NGLTF website bio that doesn’t mention that in 1977 she openly advocated for discrimination against transsexuals.

And she doesn’t appear to have ever been in need of the aid of a homeless shelter either.

Hyde responded to Marti Abernathey’s revelation that Hyde was one of the 22 lesbians who demanded that Olivia Records engage in anti-transsexual employment discrimination.

I understand and appreciate the anger that is generated by the outrageous letter to the women of Olivia Records.  It’s a personal humiliation to me that I signed such a letter, driven by ignorance and the identity politics of the time.  I am deeply regretful and sorry for my participation in the 1977 defaming of Sandy Stone and all trans people.  Nothing can make up for that kind of discrimination. But I hope that the work I have done since that time expresses my commitment to social justice and legal equality for trans sisters and brothers. I work to transform the world so that no one’s life will be diminished by gender-based and/or sexual orientation discrimination.

What about the personal suffering and misery that trans people who have been on the short end of the transphobia that metasticized throughout the gay rights industry that was in the process of professionalizing in the late 1970s?  What about the personal suffering and misery that trans people who have been denied employment inside and outside of that gay rights industry during the quarter-century that Hyde has been employed by NGLTF? What about the personal suffering of those who gave up on attempting to secure LGBT advocacy-related work when it became clear that even ‘the good organization’ had no intention of ever hiring a trans woman (and, yes, in 2001 I had a resume in at NGLTF – a resume that was given about as much consideration as a meth addict gives dental floss – but I know that even at least one trans woman attorney with far more experience than myself was given a similar mental gloss while seeking employment there at that time.)

To the readers of this post: How many people do you know (gay, trans or otherwise) who have not had to look for a job since the year that Bill Buckner let the ball go through his legs?  (Does the Massachusetts reference seem like a low blow?  Well, I could have said ‘since three years before Massachusetts gays and lesbians engineered a gay-only rights law for themselves,’ right?)

To Sue Hyde: Its not as simple as whether or not your 2011 apology for your actions in 1977 is 1000% genuine.  That is between you and your conscience – and I can think of no non-blunt way to say this: I suspect that you sleep as well every night as Joe Solmonese does, and as well as Barney Frank does, and as well as Elizabeth Birch does, and as well as Winnie Stachelberg does, and as well as Cathy Brennan does, and as well as Norah Vincent does, and as well as Victoria Brownworth does, and as well as Janice Raymond does.

Its not as simple as whether or not what you’ve done over the last quarter-century stands in opposition to what you were a signatory to in 1977.  What price have you ever paid for what you did in 1977?  What price has any of the signatories to that 1977 demand for discrimination against transsexuals – yourself, D.A. “Ollie” Oliveira, Evan Paxton, Sally Piano,  Gael Sapiro, Leni Schwendinger, Ruth Scovill, Pat Tinkler, Karla Tornella, Fran Tornabee, Lisa Vogel, Shebar Windstone, Martha Pelman, JoAnne Barry, Bobbie Birleffi, Alix Dobkin, Susan Elizabeth, Maxine Feldman, Bonnie Lockhart, Margot McFederie, Joan Medlin and Copa Mountain[looks like Copa lucked out; the scan obscures the last few letters] - ever paid for making that demand?  So far as I can tell none of you have ever paid any price – and at the very least you all were made out to be heroes (albeit not by name) by Janice Raymond in The Transsexual Empire for standing up to the howwibil, howwibul Frankensteinian transsexual horde that was demanding to be as equal in law and society as you non-transsexual lesbians were.  (Vogel’s transphobic business entity was recently defended by one of the new  generation of trans-exterminationists; is the circle ever really broken?)

You want to know what price trans people have paid for what you now profess to feel personally humiliated by after having collected a paycheck from the same employer for the last twenty-five years?

Look at the employment rolls of the various arms of Gay, Inc.

Shit, just look at the employment rolls of your own employer.

And, because there is now a new generation of trans-exterminationists polluting civil rights discourse and wallowing in fake victimhood when their targets get angry enough about what the new generation of trans-exterminationists actually have in store for transsexuals (as opposed to what they portray themselves as intending) that they say things that perhaps even the intended targets of exterminationism shouldn’t say, I need to make this crystal clear: I am neither advocating violence nor winkedly-and-noddingly saying that I’d smile if it occurred.

To the contrary…

I want all of the signatories to that 1977 demand, all of the people who capitalized on that era of transphobia and are unapolagetic, and all of the people who who hide in the plain sight of 21st Century faux-trans-inclusivity while nevertheless working to infuse trans-exterminationism into LGB(t) policy to live for a thousand years – and to never sleep a wink, tortured every minute of every night by the hopes, dreams, careers and lives that the philosophy that you signed onto in 1977 undermined, diminished, subverted and/or ended.

But I know that you, at most, will be Judah Rosenthal, who…

after the awful deed is done, he finds that he’s plagued by deep-rooted guilt. Little sparks of his religious background which he’d rejected are suddenly stirred up. He hears his father’s voice. He imagines that God is watching his every move. Suddenly, it’s not an empty universe at all, but a just and moral one, and he’s violated it. Now, he’s panic-stricken. He’s on the verge of a mental collapse-an inch away from confessing the whole thing to the police. And then one morning, he awakens. The sun is shining, his family is around him and mysteriously, the crisis has lifted. He takes his family on a vacation to Europe and as the months pass, he finds he’s not punished. In fact, he prospers. The killing gets attributed to another person-a drifter who has a number of other murders to his credit, so I mean, what the hell? One more doesn’t even matter. Now he’s scott-free. His life is completely back to normal. Back to his protected world of wealth and privilege.

You, Sue Hyde, may now, 34 years after the fact, initially be suffering from pangs of guilt (after being reminded of it by Marti Abernathey), and you may even lapse into a few fits of attempts to inflict amnesia on yourself (alcohol? whatever?).  Eventually, though, you’ll get over it and you’ll be completely back to normal, back to your protected world of Gay, Inc. privilege, just as unpunished as you have been since 1977 - while the history books place the blame for all of the 1970s lesbian-centered transphobia on Jean O’Leary, Mary Daly and Janice Raymond.

They too, though, are in reality also unpunished – even the two of the three who, in the Barry Lyndon sense, are now equal to all of the trans people who have died because of legitimized political trans-exterminationism over the last forty years.  The other?

How many people have the 22 signatories of 1977 – and those influenced by them – prevented, directly or indirectly, from ever coming close to being in a position to be anything emerita?

I hope that the work I have done since that time expresses my commitment to social justice and legal equality for trans sisters and brothers.

It expresses to me your commitment to feathering your professional nest for a quarter-century while your employer has generated a track record of non-employment of trans people that, were the issue race instead of transsexuality, would never pass disparate impact muster (while your employer’s main rhetorical competitor has employed two openly trans tokens – something that I can never decide makes it better or worse than NGLTF.)

You, the 21 other sigantories, their defenders, their apologists and those who may genuinely harbor no evil toward my people but whose civil rights psyches have been polluted indirectly by trans-exterminationism-influenced policy, created the morass of gay-led transphobic shit that trans people since the 1970s have had to fight first before ever thinking about the LGBT community as a whole – a fight which, via our mere participation in, conveniently allows you and all of those in the privileged permanent gay rights employment class to brand any trans person with any record of questioning overt institutional gay transphobia or making any suggestion that there might possibly be some gay transphobia even in the absence of anything as obvious as a 1977-style, Sister-ish manifesto as a ‘screaming tranny,’ which, of course, allows you and all of those in the privileged permanent gay rights employment class to remain in your protected world of activism wealth and permanent employment privilege.

I’ll repeat what I said above: Whether or not your 2011 apology for your actions in 1977 is 1000% genuine is between you and your conscience. 

I work to transform the world so that no one’s life will be diminished by gender-based and/or sexual orientation discrimination.

Would you like a list of all of the trans people who do so without receiving a paycheck (many bankrupting themselves in the process) but who have tried to receive a paycheck for doing so?

Or are you already at the party, fearlessly sitting next to the inebriated, heart-eviscerated Woody Allen?

The catholic church tried forgiving itself for the Inquisition.

Take a hint.


Facts? Don’t Worry About Those – We Have Something Better

August 28, 2011

Hint: its purple.  From Think Progress:

On Fox & Friends Sunday, anchor Clayton Morris admitted that Fox News factcheckers have confirmed that man-made global warming is “certainly” real, but argued that it “doesn’t matter” because climate denial is popular among Fox News-watching conservatives. Morris contrasted Jon Huntsman’s defense of the National Academy of Sciences with Rick Perry’s claims that scientists have “manipulated data” to concoct manmade global warming:

MORRIS: If you dive into the weeds a little bit on this global warming thing, you see that it seems that facts are certainly on Huntsman’s side on all of this and fact checkers have come out, we’re actually having our own brain room look look at this right now that any of Perry’s comments don’t seem to hold a lot of water. It doesn’t matter. What’s resonating right now in South Carolina is helping Governor Perry tremendously and he fired back at Huntsman on global warming and gaining traction, facts or not.

The only reason, of course, that the facts of global warming don’t “matter” for conservatives is the constant bombardment of anti-science propaganda by Fox News and other right-wing media.

Ya think?


Texas: The Wal-Mart of States (and, no, that’s not a Compliment.)

August 25, 2011

From HuffPo:

Two weeks before Thanksgiving in 2003, top officials from Texas Governor Rick Perry’s office pitched an unusual offer to the state’s retired teachers: Let’s get into the death business.

Perry’s budget director, Mike Morrissey, laid out a pitch that was both ambitious and risky, according to notes summarizing the meeting provided to The Huffington Post.

According to the notes, which were authenticated by a meeting participant, the Perry administration wanted to help Wall Street investors gamble on how long retired Texas teachers would live. Perry was promising the state big money in exchange for helping Swiss banking giant UBS set up a business of teacher death speculation.

All they had to do was convince retirees to let UBS buy life insurance policies on them. When the retirees died, those policies would pay out benefits to Wall Street speculators, and the state, supposedly, would get paid for arranging the bets. The families of the deceased former teachers would get nothing.

Wal-Mart and other economic parasites do this all the time with their slaves employees.

When the deal eventually leaked, teacher groups balked at the entire arrangement.

“It was just pretty morbid and I don’t think it convinced anybody it was gonna enrich anybody except Phil Gramm and UBS,” Texas State Teachers Association Spokesman Clay Robison told HuffPost. “Our members were pretty much appalled by it.”

You had to know that Phuckwad Phil was in there somewhere.

During the November 2003 meeting, Gramm and the Perry administration were well aware of the potential for a media debacle. “The ‘liability’ is really on the PR side for AIG … and possibly TRS,” the meeting notes read. “They want to avoid a ‘Wal-Mart’ problem.”

And now, the money shot:

The deal collapsed. But ultimately, none of its top architects paid a serious political price for the debacle. Perry did not abandon his close relationship with Gramm. A few years later, Perry’s 23-year-old son went to work for UBS, and Gramm began urging Perry to let UBS privatize the Texas state lottery. Perry named Guthrie executive director of the teacher pension fund. Morrissey is now a senior adviser to Perry. And Perry himself, of course, is now a top contender for the Republican presidential nomination.

Texas = Wal-Mart.

America = Weimar.


File Under: (Almost) Irrelevant

August 25, 2011

Twelve years ago (or so; give or take a month) I wasted the better part of a day at the Mall of America:

The mere fact that I spent Saturday night at a mall says more about me than I’d like. But it happened. And it was completely surreal.

Up first? Dinner for one at a – dare I say – authentic Texas eatery: the Alamo Grill. Yes, there is a Texas eatery in Bloomington, Minn. Trust me: Albeit only to kill time, I was there.

The whole place was faux Texan. The French fries were, well, not French. They were faux Texan-shaped like lil’ boots and hats. After waiting about five minutes for a table, I heard over the speaker: “Now seating Katrina, posse of one!” I have to assume that I was the most Texan thing in the place. I was wearing a Bastrop Bears T-shirt and no one recognized the reference to a Texas town on my chest.

I chronicled this in a column for the Texas Triangle entitled “Trans of America.”

But the restaurant that was more faux than Rick Perry’s brain (Gov. Hairball was only Lt. Governor then; the elevation, of course, occurring thanks to a coke-snorting, draft-dodging rich brat who was even more faux) was not the weirdest aspect of the evening.  I at the Alamo Grill because I was killing time waiting for a show at Knuckleheads, the comedy club within the confines of the Mall of America.

The comedian?

No, not Mitch Hedberg.

Who then?

Jackie Mason: the guy who did the voice of Krusty the Clown’s father; the guy who – to hear him tell it – was blacklisted for over 20 years because he allegedly flipped off Ed Sullivan on the air (the videotape of the incident is inconclusive); the guy who, to hear other people tell it, found out the hard way that when Frank Sinatra said not to make jokes about Frank, you had better not make jokes about Frank.

Seriously.

I sat through Mason’s entire act and I really couldn’t decide whether or not to be pissed off. It seems as though homosexuals made up at least a third of his act.

Even a bit that could easily have been unquestionably hilarious, was tinged by a questionable use of what I can only assume is yiddish for “fag.” The word sounded like “faggaluh,” but through Mason’s accent, it was hard to tell. [Kat's 2011 note: I was later reminded that the word Mason was saying was "feygelah" - the first syllable sounding like "fay" (long a) insteaf of "fuh" (short u) - which I actually had heard on occasion, perhaps most memorably from Harold Gould to Billy Crystal on Soap while Crystal's Jody is in the hospital not having SRS, but simply could not recognize due to Mason's speech pattern.]

In the bit, Mason mused about how some of the biggest hits in Vegas seem to be two things thrown together that no one would ever pay to see separately. One example went like this:

“Siegfried and Roy: two ‘faggaluhs’ and a tiger. Two ‘faggaluhs’? Nothing special. A tiger? Nothing special. But two ‘faggaluhs’ and a tiger? A hit!”

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not pitching a PC bitch for non-heterosexuals or for tigers. Any overly-glitzy Las Vegas act is fair game when it comes to humor – even humor of a questionably-phobic nature. Shit happens. Moreover, there are ways for heterosexuals to deal with sexual orientation in humor without being offensive and bigoted (Steve Martin’s now-ancient “Are there any fags in the audience tonight?” bit comes to mind.)

But it seemed as though Mason was constantly mentioning homosexuals. Usually it was something to the effect of: “I see gay pride everywhere. I have nothing against homosexuals. They should be proud.” Then he’d point at someone in the front row and say, “You! Stand up and be proud.” And laughter would ensue.

I think that even that could have passed the legit-ness test, once. But constantly? He pulled the same sexuality-challenge bit repeatedly – far too many times to count.

Think about it. He did that bit apparently not caring that there actually might be some homosexuals there. I’m sure there were some; there was at least one transsexual.

For purposes of this article, I’ll take the guy at his word that he doesn’t have anything against homosexuals. The fact that he could continually get laugh with it, though, says that society – even a society such as Minnesota, a state that has the best human-rights law in the country – does have a problem with homosexuals. And that’s a problem for all of us.

I wonder if Marcus Bachmann was in the audience that night?

The reason I’m recounting that night at the Mall of America – and the column I wrote about it – is that I’d forgotten that I’d snuck my camera into the club.  I just ran across the pix (and the negatives.)  The above shots are two of the better ones (sorry, but if I’d had any idea that I’d have been going clubbing in the evening when I left home down in greater Minnesota that day I’d have loaded the camera with something better than 400 speed film.)

But again…

I wonder if Marcus Bachmann was in the audience that night?  Michele?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers