Oh, I’m Sure the Transphobic Phake Pheminists Will Tell You

How the fuck is it our job to help our oppressors inflict our oppression upon us?

…and attempt to get an international politico-legal organization to make it mandatory.

34 Responses to Oh, I’m Sure the Transphobic Phake Pheminists Will Tell You

  1. AmyBlue says:

    Sometimes I think that you guys secretly enjoy arguing with each other, just a little bit.

    • Katrina Rose says:

      A sub-Godwin argument if there ever was one.

      • AmyBlue says:

        I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to cause offense. : (
        Just, every time I come here, it always seems like it’s the same six or so peoples arguing, regardless of what the subject is…

        …was just trying to be observant. ^_^;;

      • Katrina Rose says:

        My first remark was itself an observation – which I feel necessary to repeat here.

      • friday jones says:

        I don’t enjoy it a bit when I have to argue with bigots about how many human rights should be denied to me, I find such debate a necessary evil to avoid just letting the bigots have it their way by default. It pisses me off that my human rights are somehow up for debate by people who have allegedly been oppressed themselves and should fucking know better than to oppress my kind.

      • AmyBlue says:

        What is a sub-Godwin argument anyway? : )

      • Katrina Rose says:

        Have a nice day.

      • AmyBlue says:

        I’m sorry.
        I’ll be quiet now.

    • valeriekeefe says:

      Studio 60’s Simon Stiles had a great line about how good it made someone feel to engage with their illiterate haters. Yeah, I enjoy it, but I’d enjoy not having the hobby even more. I have neo-liberals to battle, and these ovo-don’t-know-we-can-lacto-vagitarians are a distraction.

  2. "Vic" says:

    @AmyBlue:

    I hope you learned your lesson. You don’t engage with the inmates of this asylum. They are extremely angry and bitter because they have penes! Except for Bill, who got it cut off in 1982.

    • Megan says:

      I’m pretty sure that Amy was including you and the other trolls the “you guys” part of her original comment…

    • friday jones says:

      So you’re not a man, “Vic?” Or are you telling us that you have a “pene” and that makes you angry? Tell us, how does the “pene” affect the brain in order to make the owner of said “pene” angry?

      Seems like here, and over at the Transphobin’ Hambeasts site, where they posted this:

      http://mansplaintransplain.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/what-males-say-when-they-think-theyre-talking-to-a-lesbian/

      Seems that “Vic” has basically come out of the closet as one of their tight little circle of Haterfems. “Vic” is no a dude, she’s a transphobic radfem from that small circle of haterade guzzlers, one that uses an IP proxy service in order to troll.

      The entire raison d’etre for the “Vic” character is to troll this site, using the most inflammatory rhetoric possible, in order to get one or more other people who post in the comments here riled up enough to say something that can be taken out of context in a screenshot and posted on one or more of Cathy Brennan’s pal’s sites. So “Vic” will say something incredibly triggering, including blatant rape rhetoric, and then if a response is angry, they screenshot it, post it, and say “lookit how angry the trannies are, that’s because males blah blah blah fart blah.”

      I think that the best thing would be for Kat Rose to delete Vic’s posts, and any replies to them, as soon as they appear, from now on. Why hand Cathy Brennan and her tiny cabal of twisted hateshits any ammunition for her shitty websites that look like a crazy right-winger big-hair Republican woman designed them?

      • "Vic" says:

        LOL Bill! Your comments are the best entertainment ever provided by a tranny, other than shemale porn.

        Sorry to disappoint you, but I am not Cathy Brennan or one of her associates. I do admire her for standing up to you thugs and accepting her role as the Great Satan of trannydom. And I do not “troll” here. I do not say things for the purpose of provoking a fight or moving a discussion off topic.

        The fact that you can only respond to me by calling me a troll and by begging Kat Rose to delete my comments only demonstrates your inability to defend your odious views. How sad. The only subject you know anything about is tranny stuff, and you can’t even debate that.

        Finally, I don’t need to provoke anyone into a hate-filled rant. This blog is a 5 year archive of pure hatred. There are comments on this blog, which “Kat Rose” leaves up, advocating violence. And “Kat Rose” herself dehumanizes everyone with whom she disagrees. What other blog needs to post a regular disclaimer that the blogging is “peaceful activity”? Only a blogger walking the line of hate speech needs to do that.

      • Reality says:

        Only a blogger walking the line of hate speech needs to do that.

        Or perhaps a blogger who understands that one of the more prominent trolls here (under at least one name) is a transphobic shyster who,despite continual displays of lack of legal knowledge and comprehension, has abused the political/legal system of the U.N. and should be presumed to be willing to abuse it in other contexts.

        “Kat Rose” herself dehumanizes everyone with whom she disagrees.

        Wrong again. If having the wrongness of your BS conclusively demonstrated is dehuamanizing, then you weren’t human to begin with.

      • Katrina Rose says:

        I think that the best thing would be for Kat Rose to delete Vic’s posts, and any replies to them, as soon as they appear, from now on.

        Hey, as I’ve noted: The sockhydra is essentially writing my dissertation for me. Why would I delete all of that primary source material?

      • friday jones says:

        Kat doesn’t dehumanize people, she just points out that people are behaving with subhuman manners, VIC.

      • friday jones says:

        “Why would I delete all of that primary source material?”

        Because then of everything that can possibly be taken out of context and used as proofiness that trans women are somehow bad people, Cathy Brennan and her radfem pals will screenshot them and parade them out of context, using them to ensnare impressionable young lesbians into their transphobic hate group. Why hand them more ammo for that ill behavior of theirs? Sure, today it’s just a few haterade guzzlers like Buggy and Lizardbreath and their HBS lapdogs, but you never know how a hate movement will do until after it’s too late.

    • Bianca Lynne says:

      Vic, your obsession with pasta is borderline creepy.

    • I just have to say…

      It’s disgusting, truly appalling, but every time I check out the doin’s on the Internet Hate Machines of PretendBrennan … I experience a LOLstorm?

      I offer no explanation: some jokes are best relished in isolation. But it’s at once — mildly amusing, damn funny, twisted, and pathetic?

      Sincerely,
      – bonzie anne

  3. TransGriot says:

    once again…note you never see “vic’ and a bug post at the same time.. interesting.

  4. "Vic" says:

    Your dissertation? What are you, like 40 years old? You can’t blur that out of your pic, you know. There isn’t enough gauze in the world.

    Isn’t it perhaps time to stop thinking of yourself as a life-long grad student and cat hoarder and become a productive member of society?

  5. bugbrennan says:

    YOUR ANTI-SEMITISM IS SHOWING

    http://feastofhateandfear.com/articles/from_aye.html

    SHYSTER — A Jewish professional who cons people. Taken from the Shakespearian character Shylock, in “The Merchant of Venice.”

    Katrina, why would you publish that?

    • Katrina Rose says:

      Shyster:

      shy·ster
      noun
      Informal .
      1. a lawyer who uses unprofessional or questionable methods.
      2. a person who gets along by petty, sharp practices

      Origin:
      1835–45, Americanism ; probably < German Scheisser, equivalent to scheiss ( en ) to shit + -er -er1 ; final -ser conformed to -ster

      Related forms
      shy·ster·ism, noun

      Can be confused:   ambulance chaser, mouthpiece, pettifogger, shyster

      World English Dictionary
      shyster [ ]
      — n
      informal chiefly ( US ) a person, esp a lawyer or politician, who uses discreditable or unethical methods

      [C19: probably based on Scheuster , name of a disreputable 19th-century New York lawyer]

      Slang Dictionary

      shyster definition
      [ˈʃɑɪstɚ]

      n.
      an unethical or unscrupulous lawyer. (Also a rude term of address.) : Look, you cheap shyster, I paid you to help me, not ruin me!

      Shylock:

      Shylock is a fictional character in Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice and is also a term used to describe “someone who lends money at excessive rates of interest”

      Your incompetence is proven – yet again.

      Please put a ton of time in on fighting the marriage repeal in Maryland; that will doom gay marriage in Maryland for a thousand years and force time and energy to be spent on a more pressing issue: rectifying the 2001 anti-trans law.

      Have a nice day!

  6. TransGriot says:

    Don’t you have an ambulance you need to be chasing?

  7. Appreciate the good writeup. Them the fact is became a fun bank account it. Glance difficult to additional delivered agreeable of your stuff! Mind you, how could possibly most people keep up a correspondence?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers

%d bloggers like this: