“One of the few ex-cons that did more harm after getting out of prison”

That’s Wayne Besen on holier-than-thou Watergate felon Chuck Colson, who has finally done something useful for the world by ceasing to be a part of it:

He was described as the “evil genius” of the Nixon administration, and spent the better part of a year in prison for a Watergate-related conviction. His proclamations following his release that he was a new man, redeemed by his religious faith, were met with more than skepticism by those angered at the abuses he had perpetrated as one of Nixon’s hatchet men.

But Charles “Chuck” Colson spent the next 35 years steadfast in his efforts to evangelize to a part of society scorned just as he was. And he became known perhaps just as much for his efforts to minister to prison inmates as for his infamy with Watergate.

Colson died Saturday at age 80. His death was confirmed by Jim Liske, chief executive of the Lansdowne, Va.-based Prison Fellowship Ministries that Colson founded.

…and which uses your tax money to coerce prisoners – who the state won’t protect from being sodomized by other prisoners – into giving up their right not to be sodomized by religionism.

Hell, of course, is just a big of a myth as god, compassionate conservatism, Sarah Palin’s brain, the existence of trans protections under Maryland statutory sex discrimination law, the usefulness of anyone named Romney, and the post-Watergate redemption of Colson.  However, I’ll chip in a few bucks to help build one just to ensure that Colson rots and burns in it.

37 Responses to “One of the few ex-cons that did more harm after getting out of prison”

  1. timeshare brokers…

    [...]“One of the few ex-cons that did more harm after getting out of prison” « ENDAblog[...]…

  2. Cromulent says:

    Katrina Rose says: April 22, 2012 at 2:17 pm

    Do we now know “Vic”‘s occupation?

    –——-@@@@@@@——-

    something which requires two wetsuits seems most likely – or is that an avocation?

  3. "Vic" says:

    “However, I’ll chip in a few bucks to help build one just to ensure that Colson rots and burns in it.”

    Don’t be silly. You have no money.

  4. "Vic" says:

    Um, Mr. Wilde, I think that, reality and adam’s apple notwithstanding, “Cromulent” prefers to be addressed as ma’am. Please try not to make the mistake of telling the truth. It makes “her” very angry.

    • Cromulent says:

      You assume, perhaps. Thought? Not yet in evidence.

      You also just failed the gay test – sorry ass comeback – no verbal flair. I’ll wager you dress poorly as well.

      • "Vic" says:

        Wager? Don’t be silly. You have no money either.

        90% of trannies have no money because they can’t hold down jobs due to their “colorful” personalities. All you could put up in a wager is an offer of a BJ, but no one wants that from you.

  5. Cromulent says:

    Oscar Wilde says: April 23, 2012 at 9:28 pm

    I wish I had said that, sire
    ————–
    Ah, you will Oscar, you will.

    James McNeil Whistler

  6. TransGriot says:

    Cathy..er Vic, should you be posting your trans hate in the comment sections at RadFem Hub or Queerty?

  7. Cromulent says:

    “Vic”
    on April 25, 2012 at 11:37 am said:
    Wager? Don’t be silly. You have no money either.

    90% of trannies have no money because they can’t hold down jobs due to their “colorful” personalities. All you could put up in a wager is an offer of a BJ, but no one wants that from you.

    ——–///////—–

    Clearly Vic has a closet full of Birkenstocks. And is in dire need of a date. With a person this time. He can’t stop fixating on others genitals or projecting his lonliness and unmet needs onto others. I know it’s hard to believe given your status – but people have value outside of the tawdry sexual transactions that take up such a large part of your imagination.

    Don’t despair – they say there’s someone out there for everyone. Just keep working on those social skills in group therapy.

    And repeat to yourself – “things are gonna change, I can feel it”.

    Oh – and improve your patter – it’s subpar for gay guys. If that’s really what you are.

    • "Vic" says:

      Please get together with your fellow trannies – or should I say tranny fellows? – and decide whether to accuse me of being a transphobic gay male or a lesbian “radfem”. I know that you people hate binaries, but pick one and stick with it. Perhaps the next time you all see each other on the unemployment line, you can sort out a consistent line of attack.

      • Cromulent says:

        Why so limited? You assume I’m trans and female. I could just as easily be someones partner or parent. Just as you could be a self hating trans person working through your obviously extentsive delusional system.

        Almost no – strike that – only one purportedly gay guy spends hours trolling trans sites and fixating on strangers genitals – so questioning your status shouldn’t be surprising. Certainly no well adjusted gay guys who are accepted well enough in their own communitiy does – are you lonely & this the only way you can find some sad semblance of connection with others?

        Lord knows who would hire such a deficent personality – though a few fields seem to attract such types – bill collector – law (again a glorified bill collector) – used car salesman – hairdresser – florist- or perhaps someone who inexplicably enjoys tenure due to their special relationship with a married dean.

        Unless you’re on the dole. Selling your food stamps for Tina & off brand vodka.

        No matter – you’d still be embarrassed if the other boys knew you were here – wasteing hours while waiting by the phone for the call that will never come. Perhaps you should leave hour handgun with a frien…. – sorry – with your therapist.

      • Katrina Rose says:

        Selling your food stamps for Tina & off brand vodka.

        What? There’s no market for sticky used Queer as Folk DVDs or batches of X that have been cut with strictnine?

  8. "Vic" says:

    “Why so limited? You assume I’m trans and female. I could just as easily be someones partner or parent.”

    No, I assumed you are trans and male. I doubt if you are a “partner” as most “partners” of trans folk only shell out the standard $25 for 30 minutes, and that would not allow enough time to peruse tranny blogs.

    Also, your general nastiness, anger, and hateful tone are clear indicators that you are a tranny and not partner-victim or parent-victim. Trannies are people who lack empathy. They are cruel people, and that cruelty is a bigger giveaway than their otherwise freakish appearance.

    • Katrina Rose says:

      that would not allow enough time to peruse tranny blogs.

      So how do you manage it?

      $12.50 for 15 minutes?

    • Cromulent says:

      Ah – self hating tranny it is. You fit your own profile to a T. Though – let’s be honest – even a mother couldn’t love that mug. You must be so ugly even the dog is embarrassed – won’t join you for walkies. Such a burden for you to bear.

      Here – you’ll be needing it: 1-(800) 784-2437. Someone who says they’re gay and says they’re male trolling trans sites for and fixating on sexual transactions has got to be a few fries short of a happy meal. So sad – and no one wants your “secret sauce”. Crying yourself to sleep every night. Your only friends your Barbie Doll collection. Too dumb to know when you’re getting an ass whooping.

      Oh – the humanity!

    • Heather R. says:

      No no no, “Vic” is a pretty lesbian lady with rectangular glasses frames who has had beautiful children after shoving a turkey baster full of semen donated from a lovely gay man up her hooha and who has a delightful partner who scissors with her every Thursday night. And I should know!

      • Cromulent says:

        Really? You’re Vic, aren’t you?

      • "Vic" says:

        You have a lot of sexualized aggression, which comes out in our language. Goes to show that, trannies can put on lipstick and call themselves “Heather” but in the end you are thuggish homophobic goons with a rapist mentality.

        BTW, the word is “vagina.” You don’t have to mock or shame it. And if I were a lesbian, I would be pleased to have one. Not a surgical carving that resembles a blown out tire.

      • Heather R. says:

        All us radical feminists understand that all insemination is rape, right, “Vic?” Tee hee!

  9. "Vic" says:

    @Hairy, large-boned male commenting under the name “Heather”:

    I am sorry that you feel that a discussion on rape is a source of fun and amusement. I can tell you that a woman would not have the reaction that you did.

  10. Cromulent says:

    “Vic” says:
    April 29, 2012 at 11:20 am

    You have a lot of sexualized aggression, which comes out in our language.
    ==========================

    Ah – a peer group for Vic. Or just a Freudian bra?

  11. Heather R. says:

    Nae true Scotsman would hae had the reaction ye had! Tee Hee!

    • "Vic" says:

      Aw, someone pretends to understand the no true Scotsman fallacy but really doesn’t have a clue. How cute. Oh well, at least you still have your natural feminine beauty to fall back on . . . Tee Hee!

    • Heather R. says:

      “No real woman would ever have said X, you said X, therefore you are not a real woman.” That’s your entire argument subsequent to my mere mention of the method of artificial insemination you used to become pregnant, “Vic.”

      You know, just because you prance around in kilts and say “hoot” and “och” all the time doesn’t make you the arbiter of who is actually a Scotsman. The only gate you’re really guarding is the Silly Billy Gate that leads to your “females matter” silliverse. Tee Hee!

      • Katrina Rose says:

        just because you prance around in kilts and say “hoot” and “och” all the time doesn’t make you the arbiter of who is actually a Scotsman

        …though it might mean that you’re an owl with a thing for the “Draft Dodger Rag.”

      • "Vic" says:

        No, it wasn’t an “argument subsequent” to your comment. It was an observation. It can either be true or false, but not fallacious.

        You aren’t very smart, it seems to me. FYI: That’s another observation. Perhaps if you trannies stopped practicing the oldest profession and cracked a book once in a while, you’d be less miserable.

      • Heather R. says:

        Oh, that’s different! If you’re re-branding your flat assertions of falsehood as “observations” then you are correct in pointing out that they are not “fallacious arguments” in a rhetorical framework, they are instead the heedless rantings of a person unhinged from reason. I therefore accept your apology.

        I just can’t stay mad at you. What are you cooking for our family dinner tonight? Tee Hee!

      • Heather R. says:

        It was vegan tofu veggie wraps! Yum! Tee Hee!

  12. [...] Jews – under the sad nom de transphobique “An Anonymous Woman” (actually named “Vic” perhaps?)) OR, given that bugvomit is involved, the usual level of factual inaccuracy, here re: [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers

%d bloggers like this: