Okay - when reading this post, keep in mind the following: I don’t like hate crime laws. Of course, its not for the reason that anti-constitutionist, crypto-christianist cabals such as Focus on the Fraud claim to dislike them - namely, so-called ’special rights’. In fact, is for exactly the opposite reason; they convey no rights. I defy anyone to find a single instance in which a hate crime law has actually disuaded someone from committing a hate crime against anyone of any variety; anti-discrimination laws, on the other hand, do (though not with 100% success of course) dissuade some employers from shutting members of certain categories out of the economy.
Translation: I think that, in general, hate crime laws are wastes of precious time and energy.
That having been said, however, I looooooooooove it when anti-constitutionist, crypto-christianist cabals such as Focus on the Fraud decide to go on their anti-hate-crime-laws rants. It shows them to be the morons that more people should already realize that they are.
Daddy Dobby’s Citizen Link on the addition of gender identity to New Jersey’s hate crime law.
Legislation adds gender identity as a protected status.
Well, I hate to be the one to break the news to Daddy Dobby’s minions, but, strictly speaking, that was done about a year ago with the addition of trans folks to the Law Against Discrimination.
New Jersey lawmakers voted Monday to give transgendered individuals special rights. If Gov. Jon Corzine signs the legislation, the state would be the 12th to grant such strong rights. According to gay-activist groups, New Jersey has 153 laws to protect homosexuals and transgendered people.
Again I ask: What are these special rights?
The first section of the bill adds “gender identity or expression” to the existing hate-crimes law, which includes sexual orientation, race and religion. The bill also requires all new police officers to attend a mandatory, two-hour hate-crimes sensitivity training.
So, Daddy Dobby and his minions are upset that people who enforce the law have to know what the law is about.
Oh - that’s right. Knowledge is evil.
My bad.
“This particular piece of legislation is very strong because it includes ‘gender expression,’ which is not defined,” said Greg Quinlan of New Jersey Family First, the legislative arm of the New Jersey Family Policy Council. “What does ‘gender expression’ mean?”
First, you tell me how you define ‘religion’ for purposes of ‘freedom of religion.’ Something tells me its a bit different than what the average person thinks it should mean.
In December, a federal hate-crimes measure fell apart over the effort to protect “actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity.”
I seem to recall the federal hate crimes measure falling apart over just about every other aspect of dumbass leglislative strategy. I also seem to recall it actually being approved (sort of) by the the ful House in 2005.
Oh - that’s right. Truth is evil.
My bad.
Caleb H. Price, research analyst for Focus on the Family, said the New Jersey legislation is not necessary.
“Not only is there no need for adding the category of ‘gender identity or expression’,” he said, “but this category is inherently ambiguous and unlimited — and is subject to an ever-morphing understanding of a person’s ‘perceptions’ about their biological gender.”
So how does any of that explain why a law that is intended to punish those who commit acts of violence is not needed?
Quinlan said the bill puts families, particularly women and children, in danger.
You mean it creates gay marriages?
Oh - that’s right. Sarcasm is evil.
My bad.
“What is the protection from these people going into a restroom where they identify themselves as a different gender, yet they’re using the facilities at the same time you are?” he said. “It’s exposing children — an unintended consequence of the law.”
Nice choice of word, don’tcha think? Nice image, too, that it evokes: evil, disgusting perverts exposing themselves to children.
One problem, though (and then another and another…)
(1) If you’re worried about your children getting molested, quit worrying about what goes on in the ladies’ room and start worrying about what goes on in your own churches.
(2) Strictly speaking, the law that would - in theory - undirgird cross-gender restroom usage was the aforementioned Law Against Discrimination.
Which, of course, leads me to…
(3) Taking you at face value, am I to believe that you should have the right to inflict physical violence on anyone in a given restroom who you determine isn’t gender-normative enough to be in said restroom?
The legislation also creates a Commission on Bullying in Schools, which has nine months to investigate and make recommendations to the governor.
Refer back to my comment about knowledge apparently being bad.
“New Jersey already has anti-bullying laws in place,” Quinlan said,
Citations, please? Specifics, please?
“but the bullying commission is set up to be totally sexually oriented.”
You mean to deal with the sexually oriented bullying? Yeh - that would make no sense at all, now would it?