In Other Words, He’s the J. Michael Bailey of Vaccine Studies

From CNN:

A now-retracted British study that linked autism to childhood vaccines was an “elaborate fraud” that has done long-lasting damage to public health, a leading medical publication reported Wednesday.An investigation published by the British medical journal BMJ concludes the study’s author, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, misrepresented or altered the medical histories of all 12 of the patients whose cases formed the basis of the 1998 study — and that there was “no doubt” Wakefield was responsible.

“It’s one thing to have a bad study, a study full of error, and for the authors then to admit that they made errors,” Fiona Godlee, BMJ’s editor-in-chief, told CNN. “But in this case, we have a very different picture of what seems to be a deliberate attempt to create an impression that there was a link by falsifying the data.”

Perhaps Wakefield should have conducted his ‘study’ in drag bars in Chicago and then hired Alice Dreger to pimp his legitimacy, eh?

Speaking to CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360,” Wakefield said his work has been “grossly distorted” and that he was the target of “a ruthless, pragmatic attempt to crush any attempt to investigate valid vaccine safety concerns.”

Sound familiar?

In an interview, Dr. Bailey said that nothing he did was wrong or unethical. “I interviewed people for a book,” he said. “This is a free society, and that should be allowed.”

Enter the Greek chorus:

“What happened to Bailey is important, because the harassment was so extraordinarily bad and because it could happen to any researcher in the field,” said Alice Dreger, an ethics scholar and patients’ rights advocate at Northwestern who, after conducting a lengthy investigation of Dr. Bailey’s actions, has concluded that he is essentially blameless. “If we’re going to have research at all, then we’re going to have people saying unpopular things, and if this is what happens to them, then we’ve got problems not only for science but free expression itself.”

(Yet another) memo to Alice: There’s a reason fraud is unpopular.

Or have you used your Guggenheim money to defend Bernie Madoff?

One Response to In Other Words, He’s the J. Michael Bailey of Vaccine Studies

  1. Not your friend says:

    Funny thing the actual data refuting Backfield’s study cannot be found anywhere on the net.

    One more thing Wakefield is sighted as saying to stop taking those vaccines all together. He never said anything of the kind. He said give the children separate vaccinations not all three in a cocktail.

    I love how the media is used as the club big pharma swings to beat down any debate on their products which have over the decades have killed tens of thousands of people far more than not getting vaccinated has.

    See if you can find that date refuting Wakefield’s work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: