This post is a continuation of Sockpuppet on a Shingle – thanks to said occupant of said shingle doubling down following Bianca Lynne’s pointing out that socky’s pathetic attempt to play historical overseer by cracking a mythology whip in the neighborhood of an unwashed field freak in fact proved the poor, pitiful unwashed field freak to be 100% accurate:
Can you describe to me how the alleged “sell out” happened?Who was involved, exactly? What was traded? Who were the trans activists involved at the time? Can you produce any statements from them?I eagerly await your fact-based response.
Nice try socky.
That Hawaii 1991 anti-trans political hate crime – likely referred to by those who benefited from it as the gay rights law – is self-proving.
Gay-only rights laws in and of themselves prove the presence of the gay transphobic philosophy of lies often referred to as ‘incremental progress.’
Can you describe to me how the alleged “sell out” happened?
Its called the history of the gay movement in the 1970s.
Who was involved, exactly?
Whether anyone in Hawaii in 1991 had any direct involvement in it is irrelevant and whether any of them were even acting with a working knowledge of what had happened in the 1970s is irrelevant; they were the successors-in-interest to (at least a portion of) the purge of trans issues from the gay agenda that transpired in the 1970s.
What was traded?
Our lives for your seat at the table.
Who were the trans activists involved at the time?
Who says there even were any? At some point, trans people – you know, the demographic that in the 1990s need not have even applied for positions in Gay, Inc., that would have allowed them to politick and put food on the table – have to put food on the table and fight against our gay oppressors another day.
Can you produce any statements from them?