Answer the following questions ‘yes’ or ‘no’ – no weasel wording or qualifier answers, just a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no (this is the digital age after all) – based on law as it was at the time the court in question decided the case in question, not as law might be now (e.g., Iowa after it enacted a trans-inclusive civil rights law) or how you would like the law to be (e.g., any two unmarried adults should be able to get married irrespective of sex) or how things have never been (e.g., Cathy Brennan’s lysergic theories of trans-inclusion under Maryland statutory anti-discrimination law) or otherwise how things might be if you were allowed to make use of your own personal moving-goalpost lexicon.
Was Goins v. West Group, 635 N.W. 717 (Minn. 2001), rightly decided?
Was M.T. v. J.T., 355 A.2d 204 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 1976), rightly decided?
Was Sommers v. Iowa Civil Rights Comm’n, 337 N.W.2d 470 (Iowa 1983), rightly decided?
Was Holloway v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 566 F.2d 659 (9th Cir. 1977), rightly decided?
Was Doe v. City of Minneapolis, No. C2-02-817, 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 1388 (Minn. App. Dec. 17, 2002), rightly decided?
Was In re Ladrach, 513 N.E.2d 828 (Ohio Prob. Ct., Stark Co. 1987), rightly decided?
Was Etsitty v. Utah Transit Auth., 502 F.3d 1215 (10th Cir. 2007), rightly decided?
Was In re Heilig, 816 A.2d 68 (Md. 2003), rightly decided?
Was Lopez v. River Oaks Imaging & Diagnostic Group, Inc., 542 F. Supp. 2d 653 (S.D. Tex. 2008), rightly decided?
Was Littleton v. Prange, 9 S.W.3d 223 (Tex. App. – San Antonio 1999, pet. denied), rightly decided?
Was, as NCLR asserts, the end result of the Kantaras v. Kantaras case a “victory”?
Was Pierre v. Pierre, 898 So. 2d 419 (La. Ct. App. 2004), rightly decided?